A sneak peek at London Blockchain Conference 2024
If you’re interested in blockchain utility, there’s no other place to be but at the London Blockchain Conference 2024 to explore how this tech can revolutionize the world. Grab your tickets now!
If you’re interested in blockchain utility, there’s no other place to be but at the London Blockchain Conference 2024 to explore how this tech can revolutionize the world. Grab your tickets now!
Through three weeks of COPA v Wright, one factor has hovered over the proceedings like a phantom: hundreds of documents submitted into evidence which the COPA says were forged by Dr. Craig Wright.
While several arguments question Dr. Wright's identity, the fact that he knows so much about Bitcoin and its intricacies could make one question if he was indeed the Bitcoin inventor.
Christen Ager-Hanssen's dismissal as nChain CEO is said to have been rooted in his plans to get Dr. Craig Wright's IP, even going beyond organizing a mock trial to threaten witnesses and unauthorized access to the BDO drive.
The third week of COPA v Wright saw individual COPA members put on the stand in front of Justice Mellor. This was Mellor’s first chance to see the true extent of the circus that has dedicated itself to attack Dr. Craig Wright and his status as the inventor of Bitcoin.
Viewers of the Satoshi Trial (COPA v Wright) may be focused on the answers given by witnesses on the stand, but oftentimes, queries by the judge could be a critical piece that could help unravel the truth.
Speculations arose when Meta decided to drop out of COPA quietly, but even member of the alliance, Steven Lee, could not give a concrete answer behind the reason when grilled during the Satoshi trial.
The COPA v. Wright trial is more than just a fight revolving around the real identity of Dr. Craig Wright as Satoshi Nakamoto, but it also sheds light on how essential digital identities are.
A number of witnesses took the stand for Dr. Craig Wright in London’s COPA v Wright trial, telling the court in various ways that their experience with Dr. Wright before the public release of the Bitcoin White Paper makes him a likely candidate to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
By the end of the first week of London’s COPA v Wright trial, it had become clear that Hough KC and COPA were left with a fatal conundrum: what do you put to the man who knows everything?
The COPA v Wright trial not only highlights the vulnerabilities of security systems but also sheds light on corporate theft, which has been observed in numerous legal proceedings in the past.
Perhaps the biggest surprise of COPA v Wright’s opening week is that it saw very little of the explosive anger or verbal jousting that many had imagined for a trial which has the future of the digital asset industry as its stakes.