The Bitcoin Masterclasses with Dr. Craig Wright: Why anonymity differs from privacy
In Dr. Wright's first session of The Bitcoin Masterclasses series, he gave a lecture on emphasizing the point that privacy and anonymity are different things.
In Dr. Wright's first session of The Bitcoin Masterclasses series, he gave a lecture on emphasizing the point that privacy and anonymity are different things.
This drama is just getting started, but one thing is for sure—there is a big market demand for on-chain NFT art, and many developers may start looking into BSV.
Confidentiality differs from privacy in that information is shared with the right people, while maintaining privacy means that data is kept from people but is stored on-chain to prove one's identity.
Episode 5 of the CoinGeek Weekly Livestream saw Kurt Wuckert Jr. answer questions related to Bitcoin and blockchain, such as updates on the Tulip Trading case, NFTs on BTC, and more.
The first session of The Bitcoin Masterclasses is done, but we're only getting started. Don't miss the next one in Ljubljana, Slovenia, on February 22 and 23!
On the first of a new series of CoinGeek Conversations, Dr. Craig Wright talks about regulation and how the priority should be to enforce existing financial laws because digital currency is not outside the conventional financial system.
It is the first time that a claim has been brought against the BTC outfit in its entirety, including the wider group of corporates that prop up and disseminate the system.
The Tulip Trading case proves that property rights and legal obligations apply to digital assets and blockchain projects precisely the way they apply to all other forms of human interactions.
Digital ID systems are inevitable, but should we fear them? As Dr. Craig S. Wright points out on Day 2 of The Bitcoin Masterclasses series, having a digital identity doesn't mean losing your privacy.
After being hijacked by corrupt developers, Dr. Craig Wright and those who believed in his vision restored the original Bitcoin protocol by activating the second Genesis on February 4, 2020.
Absent any further appeal by the developers, Tulip Trading’s case will proceed to trial, where the question of the extent to which blockchain developers owe legal duties to their users will be decided in full light of the evidence and the facts.
Like it or not, it seems digital identity is inevitable at this stage and rather than fighting the whole notion, we must create digital ID standards that offer privacy protections.