George Siosi Samuels takes a look into the Kleiman v Wright trial and what it could mean for the legacy of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto.
Jerry Chan gave his opinion on the biggest civil court case in recent history - Kleiman v Wright trial before the case winds down and an official court ruling soils his perspective.
As thousands of pages of evidence and hours of testimony were presented to the jury, it has become apparent that though there is a serial forger in the midst of the Kleiman v Wright suit, it isn’t Wright.
The Kleiman v Wright trial is now on its final stretch in Florida, and the fate of over $65 billion Satoshi Bitcoins lies with the jury who are set to reach their verdict on Monday.
The Florida courtroom reached full capacity as spectators, media representatives, lawyers, and interns eagerly watched both legal counsels deliver their closing arguments.
Though the case is largely about that one key question—the specific authorship of the Satoshi Nakamoto project—the jury in Kleiman v Wright civil trial is being asked to decide on 25 questions in total.
CoinGeek’s Kurt Wuckert Jr. joined ‘Lawyer You Know’ Peter Tragos to talk about the history of Bitcoin and the updates of week 3 of the Kleiman v Wright trial.
Bitcoin maximalists can’t accept that Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto because he fails to embody the mythologies these maxis adopted during the Bitcoin creator’s absence from the scene.
Former Wall Street technologist at Goldman Sachs Jerry Chan shares his views on why he is convinced that Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto.
The question in front of the jury is a formidable one: they are set to decide whether Satoshi Nakamoto was the product of Dr. Craig Wright alone, or if it was done in partnership with the late Dave Kleiman.
Dr. Craig Wright took to the witness stand for the second time in the Kleiman v. Wright trial when the defense team called him as their final witness.