The Kleiman v Wright trial didn't answer whether Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto—it produced pieces of evidence that Dr. Wright, who has a deep understanding of Bitcoin, is Satoshi.
The Kleiman vs. Wright trial was a massive victory for Bitcoin creator Dr. Craig Wright, but the fight is far from over with W&K Info Defense Research ownership in question with a $100 million judgement on the line.
The Medici era marked the expansion of commerce and the merchant class as the ruling class of power—it was a time of expansive trade and the period where the invention of banking took place.
What has all the money, the time, the work, the hotel bills, the footage, the angst around the Kleiman v Wright trial really achieved?
George Siosi Samuels takes a look into the Kleiman v Wright trial and what it could mean for the legacy of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto.
In this article, Timothy explains how there are no shortages of proposed blockchain applications and delve into disruptive innovation and how it occurs in the digital currency industry.
Jerry Chan gave his opinion on the biggest civil court case in recent history - Kleiman v Wright trial before the case winds down and an official court ruling soils his perspective.
Timothy Merkle offers an unpopular opinion that Robinhood’s recent decisions are reasonable, stating that the company is under no obligation to provide market access as its users demand.
Currently, Bitcoin City is more style than substance, as more thought has apparently gone into imagining a central plaza shaped like the BTC logo than to more mundane items such as sewage flow.
Bitcoin maximalists can’t accept that Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto because he fails to embody the mythologies these maxis adopted during the Bitcoin creator’s absence from the scene.
The token craze has taken off on BSV recently, and it is finally refreshing to see so many ambitious projects take advantage of the unbounded possibilities and scalability of the BSV blockchain.
Here are a few updates from the Kleiman v Wright trial in Miami, in case you got distracted by the serious stuff.
Jamie Wilson is a former employee of Dr. Craig Wright in Australia who appeared via a video deposition early in the trial but whose name resurfaced during the defense cross-examination of Dr. Matthew Edman.
Bitcoin’s “trial of the century” has stopped pretending it’s about enriching Ira Kleiman and is now a full-throated effort to diminish Bitcoin creator Dr. Craig Wright before his BSV technology can achieve mainstream acceptance.
The Kleiman v Wright suit, which was launched nearly four years ago, finally got underway in the Satoshi trial in Florida on November 1 and is expected to conclude around the Thanksgiving holiday.
The world of BSV is finally starting to think ‘big’ and beginning to discuss and debate the economic inevitabilities that your wallet seed phrase isn’t going to work forever.
The first two weeks of the Kleiman vs Wright trial have been intense with so many words, so many claims and counterclaims.
One character in the Kleiman v Wright Satoshi case is Jamie Wilson. He crops up in a number of places: apparently an old CFO for Dr. Craig Wright’s companies, he was deposed in 2019.
Much of the plaintiff’s time with Dr. Craig Wright on the stand has been spent far away from the topic of Dave and Dr. Wright’s work together, and instead takes an extended look at the ATO probes into Dr. Wright’s businesses in Australia.
Lawyers for Ira Kleiman and Dr. Craig Wright have been arguing in court over whether or not Ira is entitled to a share of Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin. But now it seems Ira Kleiman’s attorneys might need a victory a little more than first thought.
