At the Granath v Wright trial in Oslo, Magnus Granath's counsel asked Max Lynam about specific dates and timeframes he'd heard details of Dr. Craig Wright's projects and if he read the Bitcoin white paper.
BDO Norge manager Dashley van Schijndel testified at the recent Granath v Wright trial in Norway, explaining the points and techniques of KPMG's report and counter-point their findings.
In her testimony at the Granath v Wright trial, Klaudia Sokolowska notes some difficulties when attempting to prove digital activities from over a decade ago.
Magnus "Hodlonaut" Granath and Dr. Craig S. Wright are set to have a rematch of their September 2022 trial in Oslo after a Norwegian judge granted Dr. Wright the right to an appeal.
Dr. Craig S. Wright was "highly intellectual" and demonstrated deep knowledge on topics related to security and digital ledgers, says Australian IT professional Robert Jenkins.
Sinclair described Craig Wright's technical knowledge and understanding as standing out far above others, and this was also the point other witnesses made about the Bitcoin creator's personality.
Dr. Craig Wright is appealing last month’s Granath v Wright verdict, according to a statement released by Schjødt, the firm representing him in Norway.
The question of signature has always ranked at the top in the inquiry of Satoshi's identity, but it is only because people are stuck with self-centered and erroneous assumptions.
Friend and former colleague Shoaib Yousuf sheds some light on Dr. Craig Wright's research activities and tells of his reaction when he found out Wright had created Bitcoin.
Dr. Ami Klin tells the Oslo court that Dr. Craig Wright has a superior, prodigious intellect with a strong knowledge of history, words, philosophy, and technical matters.
Under cross-examination from Magnus Granath's counsel, Stefan Matthews' memory is probed on specific dates and details regarding the white paper draft, signing sessions, blog posts, and negotiations.
Joshua Henslee begins his latest video by pointing out that regardless of what the ruling in the defamation case was, it was wrong for Granath to say that Dr. Wright is a scammer, a fraud, and mentally ill.
