The trial in Granath v Wright has begun in Norway, as Magnus ‘Hodlonaut’ Granath attempts to convince the Oslo District Court that his Twitter rampage against Dr. Craig Wright did not amount to unlawful defamation.
On September 12, the Granath v Wright trial begins in Oslo, where Twitter troll Magnus Granath will try to convince the court that his targeted social media campaign against Dr. Craig Wright was lawful and not defamatory.
Given Dr. Craig Wright’s success in the English courts, what can the outcome in Wright v McCormack tell us about how next month’s Granath v Wright trial will go down?
The parties in Granath v Wright in Norway have filed their closing arguments with the Oslo court, shedding light on how September 12’s trial between Satoshi Nakamoto and one of his most infamous critics will go down.
Wall Street Technologist Jerry Chan addresses the media noise on the recent court case between Dr. Craig Wright and blogger and podcaster Peter McCormack.
The verdict of the case is simple and straight: The court found that Peter McCormack committed libel against Dr. Craig Wright for publicly calling him a fraud for claiming himself to be Satoshi.
The collective proceedings order accuses the exchanges of colluding to delist BSV without good reason, reducing, preventing, and distorting competition in the United Kingdom as a result.
The victory of Dr. Craig Wright in the recent Wright v McCormack case left many unsatisfied on both sides and looking forward to Bitcoin's next legal installment in the hope of a more decisive outcome.
The verdict is in: Peter McCormack is liable for defamation over his social media campaign claiming that Dr. Craig Wright’s claim to the Satoshi Nakamoto name is fraudulent.
Zhao’s defamation lawsuit is a response to Modern Media Company’s publishing of the 250th issue of Bloomberg Businessweek, which led with the title “Changpeng Zhao’s Ponzi Scheme.”
Magnus ‘Holdonaut’ Granath has been ordered to make an interim payment of £93,000 (plus VAT) to Dr. Craig Wright with respect to his failed summary judgment application.
Magnus Granath had filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the case should be thrown out on the basis that Dr. Wright had no reasonable prospect of succeeding at trial.
