Because I\u2019ve used an analogy of how gold miners add resources to circulation isn\u2019t the same as saying this is a gold economy. The transaction fee can be very low in Bitcoin. Now, if transaction fees are low and its simple and easy to transact, the more people will start using it. This isn\u2019t the Bitcoin Core concept where you need high fees and all the rest. It\u2019s exactly the opposite. They have the economics wrong. - Craig S. Wright Video seven in the Theory of Bitcoin: The Bitcoin Whitepaper series with Dr. Craig Wright and Ryan X. Charles covers the sixth section of the Bitcoin whitepaper, which is all about incentive.\u00a0 It\u2019s critical for everyone to understand that it\u2019s not just about the block reward when it comes to mining Bitcoin; the real focus should be on transaction fees because the block reward will eventually go to zero. Big blocks mean lots of transactions which means substantial transaction fees for miners.\u00a0 Charles and Dr. Wright dive into miner incentives and more throughout the episode, here are my key takeaways from their discussion. https:\/\/youtu.be\/1-ojBHVt9NA Bitcoin is a small world network According to the BitcoinSV wiki, \u201cA small world network is a network in which most nodes are not directly connected, but where the neighbors of any given node are likely to be neighbors of each other, and most nodes can be reached from every other node by a small number of hops or steps.\u201d You can also use the term \u201cMandala network\u201d to describe the same concept, as Dr. Wright and Charles do earlier in this series and as Jerry Chan does in his \u201cFuture of Bitcoin ecosystem\u201d editorial piece for CoinGeek. When asked about the significance of Bitcoin being a small world network, Dr. Wright says \u201cit\u2019s moving away from the idea that everything has to do everything. It\u2019s the typical rule of specialization.\u201d Being a small world network, in Bitcoin there\u2019s a clump of full nodes in the middle that receive everything simultaneously. All transactions do not have to reach every single node on the network and this is to enable scaling. The incentives of the network have been designed so nodes are encouraged to get the transactions that they need and nodes that do not have the transactions they need (or the block info) can ask other nodes for the information.\u00a0 Full nodes are incentivized to have all the transactions because they need them in order to win the next block. Nodes are missing opportunities if they have to request a block after missing one, it\u2019s a waste of CPU to try and solve a block that\u2019s already been solved and all other nodes have already accepted it. The significance of incentives According to Dr. Wright, there are many incentives that power the Bitcoin system and we\u2019ll start with the node operation. \u201c guide behavior. So if we want to keep nodes honest, that\u2019s really what the system\u2019s about. Then we have to give them some reason to be honest,\u201d Dr. Wright says. Dr. Wright goes on to explain that the nodes\u2019 incentives are not to get as much coin as possible because it\u2019s not to the benefit of a node to take over the network. If a node took over the network, people could clearly see there\u2019s just one big node and they won\u2019t want to use the network. The value of the coin will go down. Also, if a node is a huge percent of the network, they may be mining all the coins, but paying a huge amount to do this. Not to mention if a node captures all the Bitcoin, no one else will use it and then it\u2019s an unusable system. To balance everything out, the majority of the Bitcoin must be held by other people. When asked about 51% attacks, Dr. Wright says they won\u2019t happen because first of all the attack would be obvious\u2014there are records and the nodes will get caught. Second of all, even if there weren\u2019t any records, why would nodes invest all this money and collapse a system they\u2019re a part of? It doesn\u2019t make any sense. Bitcoin is not digital gold Despite the current BTC narrative, Bitcoin was not created to be \u201cdigital gold.\u201d The comparison is often made because there is a limited volume of gold, similar to how there is a limited volume of Bitcoin. The issue with gold is that new mines can be discovered and therefore the supply is unpredictable. This situation cannot happen with Bitcoin.\u00a0 While Dr. Wright is crystal clear in explaining that Bitcoin is not digital gold, he did reference gold miners in the whitepaper\u2014he drew a parallel between them and a node on the network. \u201cBecause I\u2019ve used an analogy of how gold miners add resources to circulation isn\u2019t the same as saying this is a gold economy,\u201d Dr. Wright clarifies. Bitcoin nodes distribute coins, but they do not issue coins. \u201cThe central authority was me on day one\u2014I issued them\u2014and then I let the system go. That\u2019s the whole point. So there\u2019s one issue in Bitcoin,\u201d Dr. Wright explains. The role of transaction fees Bitcoin miners receive a subsidy for finding blocks and they are also rewarded with the transaction fees associated with that particular block, together referred to as a the \u201ccoinbase reward.\u201d Dr. Wright emphasizes that it\u2019s not about a small number of transactions with high fees as we\u2019re seeing on networks such as BTC and ETH. Dr. Wright points out that Walmart and Amazon make money by selling goods for just a little more than the costs. \u201cThey have really, really small margins and the only way to make money on really, really small margins is to sell a hell of a lot,\u201d he says. This is why big blocks and the ability to scale massively are crucial to the health and longevity of the Bitcoin system. Seeing as the subsidy halves roughly every four years until it goes to zero, the miners will eventually have to make their money from transactions fees alone.\u00a0 \u201cThe problem is the subsidy. The subsidy is slowly disappearing, but too much grew too fast and too many people jumped on board too quickly and pumped up the subsidy and the subsidy is what skews the market. But the subsidy disappears,\u201d Dr. Wright warns. Take BTC for example. Dr. Wright explains that too much value happened too quickly. Too many people jumped on board without building anything and therefore locking BTC into an unsustainable model. People did not re-invest back into the system by building things. With BTC\u2019s block cap, there\u2019s no push to increase transaction numbers and therefore no investment in improving mining hardware. What will happen to the network when the block subsidy goes to zero? The extraordinary transaction fees are another huge issue with BTC as they severely limit the use of the system. With low transactional friction, liquidity increases. If people can actually use Bitcoin in any denomination and send it somewhere else for a small fee, we can develop network effects that actually grow. \u201cThe transaction fee can be very low in Bitcoin (SV). Now, if transaction fees are low and its simple and easy to transact, the more people will start using it. This isn\u2019t the Bitcoin Core (BTC) concept where you need high fees and all the rest. It\u2019s exactly the opposite. They have the economics wrong,\u201d Dr. Wright explains.