The lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft could either lead to a surge in legal cases involving generative AI tools or create new partnerships between media outlets and tech firms exploring AI.
2023 is a challenging year for the digital asset space, with major firms collapsing, high-profile names getting into lawsuits, and regulators rushing to balance innovation and regulation.
The cases involving Dr. Craig Wright are much larger than him, his legacy, and even the identity of Bitcoin’s inventor: they are about demonstrating that the law does apply to Bitcoin.
Assuming Tulip Trading Limited successfully proves its ownership of the coins, there will be a future trial on the issue of which duties blockchain developers owe to their users.
The U.S. securities regulator has been unsuccessful in its attempts to serve HEX and PulseChain founder Richard Heart with its lawsuit for selling unregistered securities.
Author Julian Sancton alleges their OpenAI and Microsoft’s artificial intelligence platforms, including ChatGPT, used data from nonfiction books without author compensation.
If the COPA v Wright case comes out in Dr. Craig Wright’s favor, he would likely also win the other cases on derivative rights, such as copyright and database rights.
The U.S. SEC rejected the various arguments made by Binance, stating in its response to the exchange's motion that "no court has adopted Defendants' tortured interpretation of the law."
Citing a lack of evidence, Judge William Orrick described the case filed against Midjourney, DeviantArt, and Stability AI, as "defective in numerous respects."
Lawyers representing 34 U.S. states claim in their lawsuit that Meta is engaged in multiple offenses that potentially harm teenagers and children, a statement that dismayed the tech giant.
Ira Kleiman has lost his appeal in his case against longstanding case against Dr. Craig Wright, meaning that the 2021 verdict—that Dr. Wright invented Bitcoin alone and not in partnership with Kleiman’s late brother—will stand.
The lawsuit was brought in July by individuals claiming to represent "millions of class members" and accused Google of multiple violations, including invasion of privacy and copyright infringement.
