Reserved IP Address°C
03-03-2025
BSV
$34.15
Vol 41.5m
-7.94%
BTC
$85811
Vol 70528.37m
-8.49%
BCH
$323.55
Vol 531.48m
-3.22%
LTC
$107.82
Vol 1712.26m
-13.96%
DOGE
$0.19
Vol 2780.72m
-14.8%
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

How DOGE is using AI to downsize the government

Elon Musk’s DOGE is allegedly using artificial intelligence (AI) in its mission to reduce the size of the federal government. According to recent reports, Musk—who recently sent an email to federal employees asking them to list five things they accomplished that week—plans to feed those responses into a large language model (LLM) to determine whether their work is mission critical.

Unsurprisingly, DOGE’s actions created controversy, and critics accused Musk and the DOGE team of using their email initiative to justify mass layoffs in the federal government. Musk, in response, clarified that this first email was more of a litmus test. He said any response, no matter how trivial, was enough to confirm that a living, breathing person was behind the keyboard. He emphasized that the real purpose of the email was to determine whether the individual receiving a government salary was competent enough to respond. According to Musk, the real red flag is if an employee fails to respond altogether.

U.S. President Donald Trump was quick to voice his support for Musk’s initiative, calling it “great” and emphasizing the need for outside intervention in what he described as a bloated and inefficient government.

While AI can be a tool in DOGE’s mission, it’s questionable whether it should be the only tool used to determine whether someone’s role is essential. For an LLM to make truly informed decisions, it would need to be trained on private government data—details about departmental missions, operational processes, and key objectives that are unlikely to be publicly available. Without that context, it’s unclear how effective DOGE’s AI-driven assessment will actually be.

Is the demand for AI decreasing?

Is AI demand cooling off? This week, Microsoft’s (NASDAQ: MSFT) decision to cancel several data center leases and scale back by a few hundred megawatts of capacity in data centers caused analysts to question whether the demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure is slowing down or if it was overblown, to begin with.

One possible explanation for Microsoft decreasing the bandwidth it needs from data centers could be OpenAI’s recent partnership with Oracle, announced in the summer of 2024. As a result of this partnership, OpenAI will be relying more on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure instead of Microsoft’s infrastructure, which will likely reduce Microsoft’s anticipated AI workload, making the additional capacity unnecessary.

However, this development highlights a bigger issue facing the AI industry: profitability. Despite billions of dollars in investment, most AI leaders have yet to turn a profit on their AI operations. If Microsoft really is seeing less demand than expected, it could signal that the monetization of AI is proving even more challenging than previously anticipated. AI models require massive computing power to train, run, and deliver their services to end users, but the business case for sustaining such high operational costs is still unproven, as none of the AI tech giants have turned a profit from their AI operations.

Despite these recent events, Microsoft says it remains committed to spending $80 billion on AI infrastructure this year, and other AI service providers have also stated that they will be increasing their expenditures when it comes to their artificial intelligence operations.

Amazon launches AI-infused Alexa—but will consumers care?

On February 26, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) announced Alexa+, its latest AI-enhanced virtual assistant version. Described as more conversational, capable, and smarter than ever, Alexa+ integrates large language models (LLMs), allowing it to summarize documents, organize schedules, answer complex questions, and even create quizzes from uploaded materials. It also features agentic capabilities, which Amazon calls “experts,” allowing Alexa+ to browse the web and complete complex tasks autonomously from end to end—such as booking restaurant reservations.

Although Amazon probably sees its new product launch as a win for the company, I think the launch of Alexa+ raises a few questions, especially given the product’s history.

For starters, Amazon’s devices business—which includes Alexa—has lost the company over $25 billion in recent years. Surprisingly, Alexa+ is being offered as a free product to Amazon Prime subscribers and for $19.99 to non-members, which is a strange move amid the department’s losses. This is especially puzzling given that reports previously suggested Amazon was working on a new Alexa version designed to be a revenue driver—ultimately revealed as Alexa+. This makes it an odd choice to offer it for free to Prime users.

Beyond that, I think an even bigger question is whether consumers even want AI-powered devices. Time and time again, the market has indicated that most AI-infused consumer gadgets fail to gain traction. Smart assistants like Alexa and Google Assistant have struggled to deliver meaningful value beyond basic voice commands. AI-integrated hardware often lacks compelling features that can’t already be found in existing mobile or desktop AI tools.

In order for artificial intelligence (AI) to work right within the law and thrive in the face of growing challenges, it needs to integrate an enterprise blockchain system that ensures data input quality and ownership—allowing it to keep data safe while also guaranteeing the immutability of data. Check out CoinGeek’s coverage on this emerging tech to learn more why Enterprise blockchain will be the backbone of AI.

Watch: Demonstrating the potential of blockchain’s fusion with AI

Recommended for you

Estonia partners with Saudi for e-residency program
India's Infosys partners with German airline Lufthansa to set up a global capability centre; in other news, Estonia is rolling...
March 3, 2025
SEC dumps more lawsuits but not everyone done with the whip
The SEC has given charges against 'crypto' crooks, such as Coinbase, Gemini, and Consensys, but other U.S. law enforcement agencies...
February 28, 2025
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement