Bank of England asserts private digital currencies are viable as CBDCs

The idea of state-run central banks getting in on digital currency evolution is gaining traction, especially as the coronavirus is forcing changes on how money is viewed on a global scale. The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) indicated recently that more governments are now getting involved in exploring the possibility, and one of the first countries to have considered a central bank digital currency (CBDC), the U.K., continues to develop its initiative. One of the things determined by the country’s central bank, the Bank of England (BoE), is that it might be more beneficial to turn to a private digital currency, instead of trying to build a completely new alternative. 

The BoE began exploring a CBDC about two years ago, and has continued to advance its efforts since then. Most recently, it began exploring use cases for digital currency while acknowledging that the alternative could have a negative impact on current banking and financial structures. Still, it appears that the wheels are already in motion, and BoE analysts said during a webinar yesterday that private entities might ultimately be able to provide a digital solution better than a central bank could design. 

Ben Dyson, a BoE analyst working on the CBDC initiative, points out that digital currencies still don’t fulfill the requirements needed to be considered an alternative to fiat, but added that this “doesn’t mean that it’s impossible for somebody to improve upon that technology and create something that much better fulfills the qualities of money.” He added, “We’ve seen proposals over the last year from large technology firms, for example, to build payments systems and crypto-assets that could function more as stable money.”

China is already working on its own CBDC, Japan is now, in response to China’s efforts, considering the possibility, and France is willing to hold CDBC experiments in an effort to determine the feasibility, but without any concrete plans to move forward with its own offering. Sweden has been involved, as well, examining the e-Krona digital currency, and some lawmakers in the U.S. have begun to discuss the possibility of offering either a national or even regional state-backed digital currency.

Bitcoin was never meant to be anonymous, although certain digital currency projects skipped over that section in the white paper. Still, for any country to adopt a digital currency as a legitimate form of money, anonymity will be prohibited, as it goes against all financial transaction laws that have been created by developed and developing countries over the past 100 years. Dyson touches on this during the webcast, adding, “CBDCs would have to be designed to be compliant with these [data privacy] regulations, at the same time we want to ensure that the users of CBDCs can be confident that privacy in their payments and what data is shared and on what basis and with whom. It’s unlikely that a [CBDC] could be completely anonymous but we would like to design something that respects users’ privacy and gives people control over their data.”

New to blockchain? Check out CoinGeek’s Blockchain for Beginners section, the ultimate resource guide to learn more about blockchain technology.