BusinessCecille de Jesus
Lightning Network has low success rate for routing payments, gets worse for large transactions, study finds
Apart from the KYC nightmare, merchants (and individuals) will have trouble sending even just a few dollars.
Diar, which covers analytical studies on global cryptocurrency developments, released a study on June 25 assessing the Lightning Network (LN). According to the study, despite the steady growth of the network, routing payments within it is unreliable and becomes even more so as the amount of transfers increase. Funds bounce back to the sender when transactions fail.
“…the reliability of successfully routing a payment on the Lightning Network is still quite low, especially for larger amounts. The success rate for a payment for no more than a few dollars between random LN nodes is 70% (see chart),” the study states.
“A current woe facing the LN is that it’s not ideal for sending large payments. If only the nodes that have at least one channel with sufficient capacity to route the payment are considered, the probability of successfully routing the payment of less than $200 between random LN nodes is a mere 1%.”
The study points out some of the biggest flaws of LN: requiring the sender, receiver, and intermediary to all be online at the time of a transaction. That in addition to the fact that intermediaries are needed in the first place—elimination of intermediaries was the primary goal of Bitcoin. According to Diar, the result is consistent with previous arguments against the Lightning Network—that it would lead to a network of large, centralized “banking” hubs, as Electron Cash developer Jonald Fyookball explained in a Medium post last year.
“This leads to another criticism of encouraging the creation of large hubs. The lack of liquidity between nodes, and the online factor, has led to the concentration of capacity to only a few large nodes. Ten of the largest LN nodes (0.4% of total nodes) currently have 53% of the network’s capacity while the remaining 2,500 nodes have 47%,” Diar’s study notes.
Reddit users have also been discussing the issue, with some saying the situation actually got worse since LN went live.
Many argue that once more exchanges start running the Lightning Network, transactions will begin to run smoothly as users lock up more funds to ensure the success of transactions. However, even long-term Bitcoin advocate Andreas Antonopoulos doubts it will gain mass adoption.
“I don’t think Coinbase will run Lightning, and I think there are many reasons why we’re not going to see regulated exchanges run Lightning Hubs,” Antonopoulos sais early this year.
“Imagine this from Coinbase’s perspective. They have a fully KYC/AML-ed customer on one end of their connection, but if they receive a payment that’s going to that customer over the Lightning Network, they have no idea whether that customer’s the final destination. If they receive one coming in from that customer, they have no idea if that customer’s the origin, which means their KYC just fell apart – completely fell apart.”
Note: Tokens on the Bitcoin Core (SegWit) chain are referenced as SegWitCoin BTC coins; tokens on the Bitcoin Cash ABC chain are referenced as BCH, BCH-ABC or BAB coins. Altcoins, which value privacy, anonymity, and distance from government intervention, are referenced as dark coins.
Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) is today the only Bitcoin project that follows the original Satoshi Nakamoto whitepaper, and that follows the original Satoshi protocol and design. BSV is the only public blockchain that maintains the original vision for Bitcoin and will massively scale to become the world’s new money and enterprise blockchain.