court-trial

Court rejects Wright applications for summary judgment

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

The Court in the Kleiman v Wright litigation has rejected Craig Wright’s application for summary judgment which would have pre-empted January’s jury trial and declared Wright an early victor over Ira Kleiman.

Wright filed the motion in May, calling Ira’s suit an ‘elaborate fiction’. He sought summary judgment in his favor on six grounds:

  1. The plaintiff’s claims are time-barred, as the plaintiffs were correctly served in the process of the Australian lawsuits against W&K
  2. The plaintiffs cannot establish that Craig and Dave had an oral partnership to mine Bitcoin between 2008 and 2011
  3. The property at issue in the case has already been ruled as time-barred in the context of a claim under the Florida’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act and the Defend Trade Secrets Act
  4. The court has no subject matter jurisdiction as there is no diversity in the parties, as is required
  5. Ira Kleiman has no right to cause W&K to sue Wright in light of Lynn Wright’s testimony that she has an ownership interest in W&K; Ira would have needed her consent
  6. The plaintiffs have not relied on any of Wright’s alleged statements, and that the statements alleged are about possible future acts and are not to be considered fraud

The Court denied all six grounds for summary judgment. As such, the trial will go ahead on January 4, 2021.

While each ground was denied for varying reasons, the standard required for a successful summary judgment application is difficult to meet, especially in a case as dense and heavily dependent on disputed facts such as this. A summary judgment application will only generally be accepted regarding undisputed facts, the truth of which would lead the litigation to inevitably fail were it to proceed.

This had to have been a somewhat expected outcome for Wright’s side, who have appeared to be ready to defend Kleiman’s lawsuit into the trial and beyond. It appears Wright and his legal team had already began looking beyond the now-defunct motion for summary judgment, towards the January 4 trial.

“We are continuing to prepare for trial and we look forward to a jury decision in 2021,” said Andrés Rivero, partner at law firm Rivero Mestre and Wright’s attorney.

Rulings on Wright and Kleiman’s motions in limine regarding the exclusion of evidence at trial, and Kleiman’s Daubert motion to exclude expert testimony are expected soon. CoinGeek will provide up-to-date coverage on these developments and others as they happen in the run-up to January’s trial. 

New to blockchain? Check out CoinGeek’s Blockchain for Beginners section, the ultimate resource guide to learn more about blockchain technology.

法院驳回Wright的即决判决申请

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

审理Kleiman起诉Wright这一案件的法院,驳回了Craig Wright提出的即决判决申请,该申请会使1月份的陪审团审判提前进行,并宣布Wright是在这一案件中战胜Ira Kleiman的赢家。

Wright在5月份提交了这项动议,称Ira的诉讼是“精心编造的”。他以六个理由寻求对自己有利的即决判决:

  1. 原告的诉讼时效已过,因为原告在澳大利亚对W&K的诉讼过程中得到了正确的对待
  2. 原告不能证明Craig和Dave在2008年至2011年之间口头合伙挖掘比特币
  3. 根据佛罗里达州《统一商业秘密法》(Uniform Trade Secrets Act)和《商业秘密保护法》(Defend business Secrets Act)的规定,本案中涉及的财产已被裁定为已过时效的财产
  4. 法院没有标的物管辖权,因为当事人中不存在所要求的多样性
  5. 根据Lynn Wright的证词,Ira Kleiman没有权利利用W&K起诉赖特,因为Lynn Wright拥有W&K的所有权;Ira若要利用W&K起诉Wright需要经过Lynn的同意
  6. 原告并没有相信Wright的任何证词,据称,这个证词是关于未来可能会进行的活动,并不被视为欺诈

法院驳回了即决判决的所有六个理由。因此,审判将于2021年1月4日进行。

申请中的每一个理由都因各种原因而被否决,成功的即决判决申请所要求的标准是很难达到的,特别是在像这样一个难以理解的且高度依赖有争议的事实的案件。只有对于无争议的事实,即决判决的申请才能被普遍接受,如果诉讼继续进行,无争议事实的真相将导致其不可避免地失败。

律师事务所Rivero Mestre的合伙人兼赖特的律师Andrés Rivero说:“我们正在继续为审判做准备,我们期待着陪审团在2021年做出裁决。”

预计(法院)将很快对Wright和Kleiman关于在审判中排除证据的动议(即提议)以及Kleiman的关于排除专家证词的多伯特动议做出裁决。 CoinGeek将在明年1月的审判前提供有关这一案件的进展和关于案件其他内容的最新报道。

New to blockchain? Check out CoinGeek’s Blockchain for Beginners section, the ultimate resource guide to learn more about blockchain technology.