Editorial 29 October 2018Erik Gibbs
Be careful when considering an ICO investment
Initial coin offerings (ICO) are the fashionable way to raise funds for any cryptocurrency project. The first-ever instance of the fundraising activity was seen when Mastercoin (now Omni Layer) held its ICO in 2013 and it was unarguably considered a success. However, looking at the digital currency’s status now, that ICO definitely should not be seen as such. In fact, according to a recent study, the majority of the ICOs could potentially be considered a failure.
A report published by major auditing firm Ernst and Young a little more than a week ago shows that ICOs, overall, are not the money-makers most people think. The company compared current data from 141 ICOs with the data available for the same companies in December 2017. Those 141 companies comprised 87% of all ICO funding that was attracted last year.
The auditor’s “The Class of 2017” report showed that 86% of the companies behind the ICOs are now trading lower than their prices when the offerings were listed. 30% of the projects, which correlates to 87% of the entire funding, have lost “substantially all value,” resulting in the projects being considered worthless.
Ernst and Young also indicates, “An investor purchasing a portfolio of The Class of 2017 ICOs on 1 January 2018 would most likely have lost 66% of their investment.” Additionally, a large number of the projects have now abandoned their token models completely, which could lead to the coins become totally obsolete.
The firm explains, “Abandoning their ICO investors by de-emphasizing the role of their tokens [….] projects accepting fiat usually offer some benefits for token users, similar to points in traditional loyalty programs. However, users do not use utility tokens to store value. To use the platform, users have to purchase the necessary amount and incur related transaction costs and token volatility risk.”
Despite the decline in value, and the increase in risk, many organizations still turn to ICOs in order to attract funding. Some do it to capitalize on the hype; others do it because it’s any easy to receive money without a lot of risks.
The offerings aren’t limited to only blockchain-specific organizations, either. Even some gambling companies have announced that they plan on launching an ICO in order to introduce casinos that operate through cryptocurrency. Based on the overwhelming degradation of the ICO market, an investor would be wise to think twice before turning over his or money to an ICO when there are better chances that investing in one of the top coins directly will offer better returns.
Note: Tokens on the Bitcoin Core (segwit) Chain are Referred to as BTC coins. Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) is today the only Bitcoin implementation that follows Satoshi Nakamoto’s original whitepaper for Peer to Peer Electronic Cash. Bitcoin BSV is the only major public blockchain that maintains the original vision for Bitcoin as fast, frictionless, electronic cash.
Editorial 17 January 2019
Why regulation will help grow bitcoin adoption
Money is a fundamental part of the way any society operates, and governments have controlled how it is created and used.
Editorial 17 January 2019
Bitcoin Core’s SegWit still not viable a year after being introduced
Now, we’re looking at SegWit and wondering why, over a year after it was going to “rock the crypto world,” it is still floundering, not able to achieve the success its developers anticipated.
Editorial 16 January 2019
Dan Held almost gets Satoshi’s Vision correct
Dan Held may be a notable cryptocurrency veteran and a former executive with Blockchain.com, but several recent Twitter posts offering his take on digital currencies and, in particular, the interpretation of the original Satoshi’s Vision miss the mark.