BSV
$68.73
Vol 48.19m
2.4%
BTC
$91425
Vol 75459.22m
0.88%
BCH
$444.16
Vol 504.53m
1.13%
LTC
$88.99
Vol 1402.09m
0.15%
DOGE
$0.37
Vol 9284.34m
1.52%
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

BSV developer Stephan February joined the CoinGeek Weekly Livestream this week to talk about developing tools for Bitcoin, his token protocol, scaling Bitcoin, and more.

Stephan February’s Bitcoin story

February lives in Singapore, where he runs TwoStack.org, among other things. He tells Wuckert he went there on a work assignment in the 90s, met a girl, and decided to stay.

First hearing about Bitcoin before there was even a price, February dismissed it as another peer-to-peer technology that would likely fail. He started looking deeper into it a few years later, in 2012 and remembers buying a drink with it back when it was still used as peer-to-peer electronic cash.

However, he was put off developing on it by all the restrictions being introduced, and it wasn’t until the Bitcoin Cash split in 2017 that he really got back into it. He has developed some front-end tools for Bitcoin since and has recently developed a new token protocol on BSV—the TSL1.

A new token protocol, network effects, and Ordinals

Wuckert points out how each of the token protocols on BSV has tradeoffs, whether scaling, indexing or something else. He asked February why we should solve these issues and more about the protocol he had created.

February says to think about the big-block future and the nature of peer-to-peer communication. Transactions involve “you, me, and the blockchain,” but they could involve other elements like indexers, overlay networks, APIs, and more. Many potential interesting solutions can be created from this combination of elements.

Wuckert expresses concern that network effects might prevent BSV from winning despite having the best technology. However, he still thinks it will win in the long term because of all the possibilities that can’t happen on BTC. He’s a big fan of 1Sat Ordinals because of the simplicity, scalability, and network effects.

February thinks of Ordinals as “small block tech” because they’ll require running an indexer altruistically unless someone runs one for a profit, in which case there’ll be a floor price to the value of each token. The cost of running it would scale up as the blockchain does, and due to the size of each one, it’s only possible to get a limited amount of them into each block.

Noting how the UTXO model allows for massive scaling and distributing compute horizontally, February notes that the tradeoff is that transaction inputs and outputs are separated. He explained more about his solution, saying it performs a SHA256 calculation inside a Bitcoin script. This significantly reduces the amount of computing required and provides protection against the double-spend problem.

What does this look like 6-18 months from now? After contracting the BSV Association, February says he’d like to hear some developer feedback and see standards developed. In the long term, he wants software to do for Bitcoin what Linux did for the internet.

To learn more about the new TSL1 token protocol for Bitcoinl, further updates, and a potential recession on the horizon, check out the livestream here.

Watch: Digital Asset Recovery takes token recovery seriously

Recommended for you

UNISOT makes Europe’s ‘Digital Product Passport’ easy to manage
UNISOT's Digital Product Passport module would bring greater transparency and accountability to consumer products, benefiting everyone in the value chain,...
November 18, 2024
OneCoin’s ‘Cryptoqueen’ alive and in South Africa: report
A new documentary from a German filmmaker who has been following Ruja Ignatova has dismissed claims of her death, alleging...
November 18, 2024
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement