|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
I spent most of 2025 covering blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) in the Philippines, and somewhere between fintech panels, startup demo days, and government briefings, one thing became very clear to me: we are no longer talking about potential. We are talking about practice.
The Philippines has become a living example of what real blockchain adoption looks like, not the kind driven by speculation or buzzwords, but the kind that quietly integrates into daily life. That’s why I kept returning to this story. Because while other countries were still debating whether blockchain works, something very real was already taking shape here.
Over the course of the year, I watched the narrative evolve. Blockchain stopped being framed as a risky financial experiment and started being discussed as infrastructure. This shift became impossible to ignore when government leaders began seriously exploring its use, not as a pilot for press releases, but as a mechanism for accountability. Proposals to place budget documents and public records on blockchain were not symbolic gestures. They were deliberate responses to a problem Filipinos understand deeply: corruption thrives in systems that lack transparency.
What struck me most in those conversations was how little the focus was on the technology itself. The emphasis was always on intent. Make public spending traceable. Make records verifiable. Make manipulation harder. Blockchain simply happened to be the most practical tool to support those goals. That distinction matters because it shows a level of maturity that’s often missing from global conversations around emerging tech.
After watching government leaders seriously explore blockchain as a tool for transparency, it became clear that this shift didn’t come out of nowhere. We started with wallets. Long before tokenization became a talking point and before governments seriously began experimenting with distributed ledgers, Filipinos were already living digitally. Mobile wallets like GCash, Maya, Coins.ph, and PDAX weren’t niche products; they were everyday necessities, used for remittances, paying bills, small payments, and side hustles. Most people didn’t think of this as “blockchain adoption,” but that early comfort with digital finance made everything that followed feel natural. When blockchain and crypto features arrived, the groundwork had already been laid.
That foundation explains why adoption here feels different. When blockchain entered the national conversation, it didn’t feel foreign. It felt like an extension of tools people already trusted.
At the same time, I spent the year speaking with founders and operators who were building quietly and deliberately. They weren’t chasing hype cycles or pitching disruption for disruption’s sake. Payment platforms focused on reliability and scale. Startups talked about compliance, regulation, and sustainability. At events like Philippine Blockchain Week and BUILD, the tone had clearly shifted. The question was no longer “What can blockchain do?” but “Where does it actually make sense?”
AI entered the picture in much the same way. I saw how it was being used to strengthen fraud detection, improve credit assessments, and streamline operations, particularly in financial services. But there was also an honest reckoning with the risks. Industry leaders acknowledged that AI can just as easily amplify existing problems if left unchecked. Innovation, the consensus seemed to be, only works when responsibility grows alongside it.
What the Philippines offers the world is not a perfect model, but a practical one. We are a developing country with real constraints, real inequalities, and real trust issues. And yet, we’ve shown that emerging technology doesn’t need to be futuristic to be effective. It needs to be useful. It needs to be accessible. And it needs to earn trust over time.
The biggest lesson of 2025 is that adoption doesn’t start with white papers or policy declarations. It begins with people. When technology solves everyday problems such as sending money home, paying bills, and tracking public funds, then adoption follows naturally.
As we move toward 2026, I don’t expect louder promises. I expect deeper integration. More government systems built on transparent infrastructure. Stronger guardrails around AI. Closer collaboration between regulators and builders. Less noise, more signal.
That’s why this story matters and why I’ll keep telling it. The Philippines is no longer just participating in the blockchain conversation. In many ways, it’s showing the world how adoption actually happens.
Watch: Philippine ingenuity sparks green innovation at Shell LiveWire 2025




