Editorial 2 years ago

CoinGeek

Core Subversion: Close To Conclusive

It is a fairly long-held belief that the folk behind Bitcoin Core are in the pay of the big banks but that could be a positive, they could be trying to make it recognized and ‘trusted.’

But, some take it further and say Core are actually trying to subvert Bitcoin and here at CoinGeek we refused to print conspiracy theories and asked for evidence. What we got was strong evidence, written, documented evidence.

In this post Core actually allow themselves to be quoted saying: “I don’t care what they were designed for…I care what they are today.”

Hang on, that doesn’t PROVE they are sabotaging actual code, though. No indeed, but, panic not, we have strong evidence on that too:

Here we can see them slipping new signatures into the code, and again here:

Huh? It’s not easy to get a grip on but it’s certainly appears that they are subverting the system update by update. [Those that get code may leave, those that need a little more background can join our section, unimaginatively, called ‘The Background’].

The Background:

The cap is forcing fees up. This is making Bitcoin slower and less able to be a cash system. The cap is all this is stopping growth, not technology, just a number that can easily be increased.

Like anything to make Bitcoin work, it needs users. There is a reason not to scale. It makes Lightning and Segwit competitive (Both core elements of, er Core).

Lightning is all about creating a global credit network which then ties funds up for 6 months or so. How many people have 6 months available to place into a bank? The alternative is, of course, that you loan the funds.

AHA, seeing the dollar sings now, right? Imagine a global credit network run by [insert unpleasant group of many-grabbing power-seekers here].

The problem is elasticity of demand. People do not care that they use Bitcoin, they want low cost financial services. That is cash based ones. Changing to a credit system is not the answer.

OK, so what is clever clogs?

  1. Bitcoin with the cap removed
  2. An alternative cryptocurrency (AltCC)

Now, inevitably, an ‘AltCC’ will find similar enemies along its path and (yes, we declare a bias here) we feel Bitcoin has come so far that it would be a shame/waste to go back to the (near) beginning again. Especially, as mentioned, similar highwaymen will remain on the roads regardless of the version offered.

This area will grow, it is just will it be Bitcoin or an AltCC?

But then, maybe this is what they desire? The evidence at the start of the piece strongly suggests that is the case. We say proves it.

The Problem:

Note: Tokens on the Bitcoin Core (segwit) Chain are Referred to as BTC coins. Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) is today the only Bitcoin implementation that follows Satoshi Nakamoto’s original whitepaper for Peer to Peer Electronic Cash. Bitcoin BSV is the only major public blockchain that maintains the original vision for Bitcoin as fast, frictionless, electronic cash.

COMMENT

Add a Comment

lastest news

Growing pains of a new technology

Editorial 3 days ago

Growing pains of a new technology

The recent hash war seemed vaguely familiar. What does all this remind you of? - A new technology with the potential to change the world - Rival groups fighting over protocols they each see as ...

Read More
Exchanges need to delist ABC Coin immediately!

Editorial 6 days ago

Exchanges need to delist ABC Coin immediately!

In light of the mess made of the November 15 Bitcoin Cash upgrade and the billions of dollars knocked out of the overall cryptomarket as a result of Bitcoin ABC's reckless behaviour, we're asking cryptocurrency ...

Read More
Crypto crash creating credibility, not chaos

Editorial 1 week ago

Crypto crash creating credibility, not chaos

The cryptocurrency sell-off has a number of investors singing the blues. More than a handful of individuals bought into crypto following Bitcoin Core’s (BTC) massive price gains last year, expecting to see the same explosive ...

Read More