BSV
$66.8
Vol 69.08m
-5%
BTC
$90179
Vol 47968.81m
-0.74%
BCH
$434.62
Vol 903.59m
-6.34%
LTC
$88.71
Vol 1954.99m
-4.36%
DOGE
$0.36
Vol 9302.6m
-1.13%
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Cryptocurrency exchange BitGrail, which recently made headlines due to February’s Nano hack, found itself again a victim of yet another unfortunate incident that dented quite a bit of its credibility.

On May 2, the Italy-based cryptocurrency exchange announced that it would be resuming its operations, only to inform its customers that it was closing down  the BitGrail platform until further notice after just three hours of being open.

On its website, BitGrail explained the recent snafu, saying that one of its aggrieved clients filed a petition to close Bitgrail until a court case is heard on May 16:

“This morning, following the re-opening, we were notified of a deed by the court of Florence requesting the immediate closure of BitGrail and this situation will persist until a decision is made by the courts, about the precautionary suspension request made by the Bonelli law office on behalf of a client.”

The Italian cryptocurrency exchange said that although they did not agree with the decision, they had to respect the law and suspend the BitGrail operation with immediate effect.

In February, BitGrail was robbed of around $187 million worth of Nano tokens. It was one of the main portals that traded in this token, which was known before as RaiBlocks. When founder Francesco Firano announced the hack, he was met with a wave of scepticism that further dented the reputation of the exchange. In January, the exchange had also halted all withdrawals and deposits of the Nano, List and Cryptoforecast tokens. It also announced new identity verification and anti-money laundering protocols with the possibility of blocking non-European users.

Investors who lost their funds filed a petition which asked the Italian courts to declare the cryptocurrency exchange bankrupt. The Italian law firm, BonelliErede filed a bankruptcy petition on behalf of BitGrail creditor Espen Enger, who was in touch with hundreds of hack victims.

BitGrail had vowed to refund the victims last March, but nothing has happened since a proposal was floated to issue a new BitGrail shares token which would have covered 80% of the losses. The remaining 20% would be paid in Nano token; however, those who accepted this proposal would have to forego any legal action against the company. Nothing has been heard of the proposal since.

To add to its woes, BitGrail received another lawsuit by an American law firm Silver Miller acting on behalf of its client, Alex Brola who invested the amount of $50,000 in Nano in 2017. In its suit, the firm sought for the altcoin to conduct a hard fork which would reset its amount to where it had been before the theft occurred. The Nano Foundation had announced that it would be sponsoring a legal fund to provide all BitGrail victims with appropriate legal representation.

Recommended for you

This Week in AI: US, China clash; Amazon eyes in-house chips
China and the U.S. are butting heads anew over trade, while Amazon eyes to become a major player in the...
November 15, 2024
CREATE MORE Act and its impact on emerging tech
Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. signed the CREATE MORE Act into law, focusing on lowering corporate taxes, simplifying business processes,...
November 15, 2024
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement