"The Times 03\/Jan\/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks." The above is the raw text data embedded in the genesis block of Bitcoin. For years those who have sought to use Bitcoin to further their own political agendas have cited the short snippet as proof that Bitcoin was created as a response to the financial collapse of 2008 and a cypherpunk\u2019s response to the established financial system. Despite no evidence to support the claim, Satoshi Nakamoto is envisioned to be an anarchist born out of the Cypherpunk\u2019s Manifesto here to bring a radical new society without government and laws. It\u2019s an interesting turn of events that the creator of Bitcoin has nothing in common with this image dreamed up by anarchists. In a recent blog post written by Craig Wright, the work of the Greek playwright Aeschylus\u2019 is cited as a case study and critique of modern cypherpunk thought. Oresteia is a trilogy of plays with enough political murder to make George RR Martin look tame. Oresteia: A critique of modern cypherpunk thought In it, Agamemnon returns home from the Trojan War where his wife, Clytemnestra, plots his murder for her own selfish gain. Years after Clytemnestra and her lover succeed in killing Agamemnon, Agamemnon\u2019s son Orestes returns to enact vengeance on his mother. After Orestes commits matricide, the reader is left confused as to who is in the right and who is in the wrong throughout a saga of emotionally charged revenge killings. The gods are just as confused, and \u201cAthena attempts to solve the dilemma through the invention of a new institution: the court of law.\u201d Prior to Athena\u2019s intervention, the characters in the play existed under no legal protections. They lived in the state of anarchy desired by the cypherpunks, and murder had only the consequence of a guilty conscience. Craig then asks the question: Would society be better if no laws existed against even ? Craig argues that \u201cwe can start to see that men are freer in a civil society where law exists, compared to the lawless condition that once existed.\u201d A cypherpunk might read this and immediately call Craig a \u201cstatist,\u201d but he rebuts that shortly thereafter: As is the case with many things, it is moderation that creates the ideal society. The best society is not the one with the most laws, nor does it lie in the other extreme of no law (anarchy). Why assassination markets don\u2019t create societies An \u201cassassination market\u201d was an idea thought up in 1994 by Timothy May, a cypherpunk from the mailing list Craig used to respond on. It was a way for anarchists to replace a court of law with a prediction market that \u201ccould, presumably, make up a list of people who had seriously violated the NAP (Non-aggression Principle)\u201d where market participants could bet on when these people would die. Timothy May cited the use of untraceable digital cash as a way to accomplish this system. The critical thinker would assume that Satoshi, through the creation of traceable digital cash, most likely would have opposed May\u2019s views on assassination markets. Craig writes \u201cthere is the fallacy that assassination markets would keep us honest\u2026 in creating Bitcoin, I needed to find something that would not, as all other peer-to-peer networks had, devolve into an anarchist \u2018free-for-fall\u2019... it is not a system that cannot be followed or traced.\u201d He is clear in his opposition to May\u2019s ideas: \u201cAssassination markets do not create societies. They create corrupt systems and kleptocracies.\u201d Craig goes on to cite Plato\u2019s Euthyphro to examine a separate problem from Oresteia - \u201cconflicting laws and requirements of honour\u201d. He discusses how society is made up of many people \u201cwho have differing views and perspectives\u201d and that society is about tradeoffs, for which we should be grateful to have in a western society. I wasn\u2019t surprised to see Craig cite Greek and Roman thought to examine these philosophical topics. Over the past few years I have been telling Craig he should start a book club so that I and others could have some direction in what to study Bitcoin further. When he announced he would be putting up the first in a series of books, I was excited to see what area of computer science, economics, cryptography, or other realm of information the book topic would be. I was quite surprised to see Plato\u2019s The Republic cited to study \u201cpolitics and the state\u201d with a series of thought-provoking questions about the nature of the state and whether or not we agreed with Plato\u2019s views. Craig\u2019s fascination with ancient literature is summed up in his blog post: Many of the problems we see now come from a lack of understanding of the past. More than two and a half millennia ago, the Greek and Roman societies faced similar conundrums. It is not a problem that they needed to solve. He then warns that we must learn from history so as to not be doomed to repeat it. It is with a rich irony that we find the creator of Bitcoin arguing against the common wisdom of the cypherpunks, and instead shows a different vision for his digital cash invention. Not a vision of individuals living in the shadows free from the effects of their actions, but instead a new system that allows honest people to compete without corruption. With the wisdom of our ancestors in our mind, Bitcoin enables us to build a new society not through radical rebellion, but through honest competition.