Editorial 28 July 2017

Eli Afram

What do Core think of Bitcoin Cash?

The question in the title is misleading. Because what Core think, and what Core and Blockstream want you to think and believe, are two entirely separate things.

Recently Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr (aka Luke-jr) wrote an opinion piece almost entirely about “Bitcoin Cash” itself.

But before we get onto the Bitcoin Cash topic here, let me address one glaring point made by Luke early on in his piece. Given that Segwit2x is well underway now, Luke actually makes an admission – stating, and I quote “Basically, BIP148 (UASF) was an early success”. This statement conclusively reaffirms statements I made in an earlier piece that Blockstream (UASF) and DCG ( Segwit2x) are in bed together. And I’m going to restate this – big blockers have been played.

But Luke’s ponderous post is genuinely a marvel in deceit. He bewilderingly states that “Bitcoin Cash” is an altcoin, and that it is an attempt to hijack Bitcoin.

This play on words is all too common within the Blockstream camp. The hijacking came from Blockstream and no one else. But to help illustrate this point, allow me to paint this picture. Suppose you are part of an open source project. You release a founding paper specifying your project’s inner workings, methods, and overall operation. Your project is unfunded, but passionately developed within an open, transparent, thriving community. A new company emerges, and cleverly makes its way among your development team, and receives an incredibly large amount of funding from some very big players in the industry. This company then starts to weed out some of the early developers of the project, and particularly those who don’t agree with the company’s very distinct vision.

Discussion and promotion of the original founding paper is prohibited. This company then (for argument sake let’s just call it Blockstream) rewrites the project to a vision that is incompatible with its original founding paper. So then in retaliation a small group of people, some who were there in the beginning, come together, and re-launch or rather see the continuation of the original project with the original intention, following the original founding paper.

Who in the above paradigm hijacked the project? Unless you are heavily compromised, it takes no genius to figure out the answer. Blockstream took over Bitcoin, fundamentally changed its course direction, and are now actively attacking the minority who wish to retain the original vision.

Bitcoin’s community has been aggressively split for several years now. If Luke’s heart was in the right place, he should genuinely wish Bitcoin Cash all the best, and in fact thank them for going their own way, and finally ending years of dispute. Instead he chooses to attack further.

Segregated Witness is an extreme departure from the Bitcoin described in inventor, and creator, Satoshi Nakamoto’s white paper.

Satoshi in his wisdom wrote “Bitcoin can already scale much larger than [VISA] with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost.” Bitcoin was already scaleable, it didn’t need Segwit. The threat “Bitcoin Cash” poses  is that it can finally prove itself, with the removal of the 1MB temporary cap it will demonstrate to the world that Core devs were lying all along, and Bitcoin can scale to astronomical heights, and operate very efficiently and securely.

So now the new agenda by Core and Blockstream is to attack “Bitcoin Cash” as an altcoin, and to discredit its position as the true Bitcoin. But anyone reading Satoshi’s whitepaper and other writings will instantly recognise that ‘Bitcoin Cash’ is indeed the coin the inventor and creator desired. But this isn’t about doing it for ‘Satoshi’. It is about recognising that there was nothing ever wrong with the original roadmap for Bitcoin. The derailment by Blockstream into Segwit isn’t for Bitcoin’s benefit, it is actually for the benefit of Blockstream and its many investors.

Luke also stated that “this isn’t a particularly unique or even first-of-kind altcoin: “Bitcoin Dark” and “Bitcoin Plus” have tried to hijack the “Bitcoin” name previously”.

Again, he mentions the term ‘hijacking’. This isn’t hijacking anything. If Blockstream chooses to fundamentally change the inner workings of Bitcoin, and a group of loyalists who truly believe in Bitcoin’s capability in its current form with the transaction cap removed choose to keep things as they are –  why should it not be called Bitcoin? Bitcoin Cash is true Bitcoin in every sense of the word, and is 100% aligned to the whitepaper description.

Luke’s stated “Bitcoin Plus” and “Bitcoin Dark” are both non-compliant to Bitcoin’s whitepaper, and further they did not maintain Bitcoin’s existing ledger as they were not forks of the main chain. Luke’s inclusion of these two cryptos is intentionally misleading.

Segwit on the other hand is so much so a departure from Bitcoin’s whitepaper that if you would determine altcoins on technicalities alone, Segwit would be it, hands down. Where does the white paper mention splitting witness data?

Why should a central body, such as Blockstream, have the final say as to what Bitcoin is and isn’t. Bitcoin Cash’s value and status will in the end be determined by the free and open market, not by the rantings of a Core developer.

Eli Afram
@justicemate

Note: Tokens on the Bitcoin Core (segwit) Chain are Referred to as BTC coins. Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) is today the only Bitcoin implementation that follows Satoshi Nakamoto’s original whitepaper for Peer to Peer Electronic Cash. Bitcoin BSV is the only major public blockchain that maintains the original vision for Bitcoin as fast, frictionless, electronic cash.

COMMENT

Jeabope

Cialis Without A Doctor’S Prescription cialis for sale Can Nolvadex Be Shipped Into The Us Cialis Generique Canada Comprar Cialis Al Mayoreo Buy Kamagra Online Next Day Delivery Ibuprofen Amoxicillin viagra Viagra Sold In The Us Only Kamagra Oral Jelly 10 Proscar Ogame Propecia Finasteride Next Day Delivery Discount Ventajas Del Kamagra Are Canadian Viagra Sold Online Safe? Cheap Generic Drugs From India viagra Kamagra Walmart Generic Propecia 5mg X Pills Viagra Kaufen Mit Paypal Atenolol viagra prescription Levitra In Biologia Shop Prednisone Online Kamagra Ireland Itch Reaction To Amoxicillin canadian levitra Buy Levitra Wholesale Buy Tamoxifen Research Chemical Vipps Pharmacy Canada Viagra

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Jeabope

Clomid Est Provames Cialis Andorra Online Can I Have Alchohol With Keflex levitra. brand name bayer.. 20 mg. Buying Discount Secure Ordering Acticin Pills Store Amoxicillin And Pregnancy Test Results Retina A Without Precription brand levitra 20mg Kamagra Acheter En Belgique Tadalafil Livraison Rapide Levitra 8 Compresse Viagra For Aldre viagra Ialis Sans Ordonnance En Belgique Propecia Barato viagra Is Ordering Viagra Online Safe Get Levitra Vendita Levitra Generico Acquisto Viagra Sans En Avoir Besoin Buy Nexium From Canada Kamagra Dosis acquista vardenafil Orlistat Diet Pill Female Kamagra Tablets

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Jeabope

Kamagra Jalea Ajanta Pharma Zithromax 250 Mg Price Female Kamagra Tablets viagra Precio Levitra 20 Mg Farmacia What Are The Reactions To Amoxicillin Instructions Priligy

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Leandra Hyche

I cannot say thank you enough to the wild hacker crew. They saved me from spending my life with a cheater and a bitch. Got her phone texts in 72 hours which they said was slow and they even gave me $100 back ! I WAS LIKE WTF ! Dont get fucked by some fake ass hackers go the see wild hacker crew here – http://456bosfo4pgtbrv3.onion using TOR Wild hacker crew

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Buying coffee with crypto? Not with BTC, says Starbucks exec - Coingeek

[…] For micro-payments there are cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Cash designed to make quick, low-cost transactions over a securely connected network. Buying a $3 cup of coffee shouldn’t rake in ten times the same amount in processing fees for a transaction that would take about half an hour (two blocks mined after the transaction order). This is the case with BTC, a highly-congested cryptocurrency network which relies on a single corporate-controlled development team. […]

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Add a Comment

latest news

Why regulation will help grow bitcoin adoption

Editorial 17 January 2019

Why regulation will help grow bitcoin adoption

Money is a fundamental part of the way any society operates, and governments have controlled how it is created and used.

Read More
Bitcoin Core’s SegWit still not viable a year after being introduced

Editorial 17 January 2019

Bitcoin Core’s SegWit still not viable a year after being introduced

Now, we’re looking at SegWit and wondering why, over a year after it was going to “rock the crypto world,” it is still floundering, not able to achieve the success its developers anticipated.

Read More
Dan Held almost gets Satoshi’s Vision correct

Editorial 16 January 2019

Dan Held almost gets Satoshi’s Vision correct

Dan Held may be a notable cryptocurrency veteran and a former executive with Blockchain.com, but several recent Twitter posts offering his take on digital currencies and, in particular, the interpretation of the original Satoshi’s Vision miss the mark.

Read More